Prediction Markets and Tax: Why You Need to Plan Ahead
Prediction markets have experienced a rapid surge in popularity, drawing in investors, crypto enthusiasts, and high-net-worth individuals looking for alternative ways to engage with the broader financial markets. Platforms like Kalshi have introduced a unique form of trading, enabling participants to buy and sell contracts based directly on the likelihood of future real-world events occurring.
While public attention has largely focused on the mechanics of how these trades work, an equally critical issue is beginning to take center stage: the tax implications.
A recent legislative move by North Carolina indicates that state governments are starting to design tax frameworks specifically targeted at prediction markets. While this new state law targets operators rather than individual traders, it points to a much larger shift. Both federal and state regulators are increasingly treating prediction markets as permanent features of the financial ecosystem. This means tax rules, compliance obligations, and reporting structures will continue to change.
If you actively trade these event-based contracts, now is the time to start paying attention to your tax strategy.
Understanding Prediction Markets
Prediction markets allow participants to trade contracts that are tied directly to the outcome of future events. Unlike buying shares of stock in a business or putting money into a mutual fund, traders buy contracts that fluctuate in value depending on whether a specific event actually happens.
These contracts typically hinge on economic and political developments, such as:
- Whether the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates within the year
- Whether inflation will surpass a specific benchmark percentage
- Whether Congress will pass a particular piece of legislation
- Whether a specific economic indicator will hit a designated level
Although these platforms might seem similar to sports betting at first glance, there is a major legal and regulatory distinction between the two.
Many prediction market platforms operate under the close oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the federal agency charged with regulating U.S. derivatives markets. Rather than treating these platforms as sportsbooks, the CFTC regulates certain event contracts as distinct financial products. This regulatory distinction is becoming highly significant for both taxpayers and regulators alike.
The Significance of North Carolina's New Legislation
North Carolina recently passed legislation that implements a 6% tax on the net trading fee revenue earned by prediction-market operators that is attributable to the state. This same bill also raised the state's sports wagering tax.
The real significance of this law goes far beyond the introduction of a new tax.
By enacting this law, North Carolina chose to recognize CFTC-regulated prediction-market platforms as distinct entities, entirely separate from traditional sports wagering. Rather than trying to lump these platforms under general gambling definitions, the state explicitly acknowledged the federal regulatory structure set up by the CFTC.
For individual traders, this specific state law does not create a new personal tax on your direct trading activity. However, it signals that legislators are beginning to construct tax systems around prediction markets as their own unique asset class. Once governments begin creating industry-specific rules, more detailed tax guidance generally follows.
Federal Regulatory Evolution
The federal government is also taking a more active role in defining this space. The CFTC has consistently maintained that federally regulated event-contract markets fall squarely within its jurisdiction, rather than being subject to state-level gambling laws. The agency has recently defended this regulatory boundary in litigation involving state-level attempts to regulate prediction-market activity.
While these legal disputes primarily impact the exchanges and platforms themselves, they also serve as proof that prediction markets are cementing their place within the broader U.S. financial system. As this institutional recognition grows, more formal tax guidance and reporting expectations are bound to follow.
How Are Your Winnings Actually Taxed?
The most pressing challenge for active traders is that the IRS has not yet released comprehensive guidance specifically addressing prediction market transactions. In the absence of direct rules, tax professionals must evaluate several possible reporting methods based on existing tax law.
Option 1: Gambling Income Treatment
One path is to treat prediction market winnings as gambling income. Under this treatment, your net winnings are generally taxed as ordinary income at your marginal tax rate. However, gambling losses can typically only be used to offset gambling winnings if you itemize your deductions. Furthermore, current law limits the deduction for gambling losses to 90% of those losses. In certain situations, this limitation could leave you with a tax liability even if you broke even economically over the year.
Option 2: Capital Asset Treatment
Another option is to treat prediction market contracts as capital assets. Under this framework, gains and losses are reported similarly to standard property transactions, with individual trades documented on Form 8949. Net capital losses can be used to offset capital gains, and you can offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income each year, subject to standard limits.
Option 3: Section 1256 Contracts
A third potential path exists for certain contracts traded on CFTC-designated contract markets. Depending on the nature of the contract and the applicable tax regulations, some transactions might qualify for tax treatment under Section 1256 of the Internal Revenue Code. This provides a favorable tax split of 60% long-term and 40% short-term capital gains, regardless of how long you actually held the contract.
Because the IRS has not yet provided a definitive answer, there is no single, universal method that applies to every prediction market transaction.
The Case for Conservative Tax Reporting
Without clear guidelines from the IRS, many tax advisors recommend taking a conservative reporting stance.
Treating prediction market gains as ordinary income is generally the most audit-resistant path because it applies the least favorable tax treatment. While this approach might mean paying more tax than would eventually be required under future IRS guidelines, it significantly lowers the risk of the IRS claiming that you underreported your income.
Adopting a conservative approach also helps shield you from potential accuracy-related penalties if the IRS eventually settles on a stricter interpretation of these financial instruments.
Importantly, if the IRS does issue more favorable guidance down the road, you may have the opportunity to file an amended return to claim a refund. Generally, taxpayers have three years from the date the original return was filed, or two years from the date the tax was paid, whichever is later, to file an amendment.
For many active traders, paying a slightly higher tax bill today is far better than facing unexpected tax bills, interest, and penalties later under a strict IRS audit.
Essential Planning Questions for Investors
Whenever a new financial asset experiences a boom, tax complexities are never far behind. Prediction markets are no exception. Active traders should be asking several key questions:
- How should my gains and losses be reported on my return?
- Which specific tax treatment fits my exact transactions?
- Will reporting requirements change in the near future?
- What specific records do I need to keep?
- Will platforms eventually report my transaction information directly to the IRS?
- How will my state tax these transactions?
These are not questions you want to address at the last minute when you are filling out your tax organizer. These are strategic tax planning questions that should be discussed with a professional well before filing season begins.
Lessons from the Cryptocurrency Tax Curve
If you have traded cryptocurrency, this pattern probably feels familiar. In the early days of digital assets, official tax reporting guidance was scarce, and many assumed the IRS would not focus heavily on crypto transactions. Over time, however, the IRS dramatically ramped up enforcement, introduced new reporting requirements, updated tax forms, and demanded thorough disclosures.
While prediction markets are not cryptocurrency and may not be regulated in the exact same manner, they share a key trait: both are emerging financial instruments that developed far faster than the tax rules meant to govern them. As these markets continue to scale, we expect the IRS to introduce more formal guidance, expanded information reporting, and new state-level rules.
The Vital Role of Meticulous Recordkeeping
No matter how future tax rules shake out, keeping detailed, organized records is your best line of defense. If you actively trade prediction contracts, make sure you retain:
- Trade confirmations
- Purchase and settlement dates
- Contract values
- Trading fees
- Monthly or annual account statements
- Annual tax reporting documents
Keeping organized records throughout the year makes tax preparation much simpler, helps ensure your transactions are reported correctly, and allows us to spot planning opportunities while defending your return if the IRS asks questions later.
Anticipating Future State Tax Actions
North Carolina is likely just the first of many states to take action on prediction markets. As these platforms grow, more states will look for ways to tax the businesses operating within their borders and decide how this activity fits within their current tax systems.
Some states may follow North Carolina's lead by recognizing federally regulated platforms and applying taxes at the operator level. Others might take a more aggressive regulatory approach, while some may wait for the federal government to issue clear guidelines before taking action. Regardless of the path individual states choose, the trend is clear: prediction markets are entering the mainstream financial landscape, and tax policy is catching up.
Proactive Planning Protects Your Bottom Line
Many investors make the mistake of only thinking about taxes after the calendar year has already closed. By that point, many of the best tax-planning opportunities have already passed.
If you are actively trading prediction market contracts, one of your most important decisions is not just how much money you made, but how you choose to report those transactions. With the IRS still silent on definitive guidance, selecting a reasonable, defensible reporting position and fully documenting it is just as critical as running the numbers.
A proactive review of your trading activity before filing your tax return can help identify reporting issues, determine the most appropriate tax treatment under existing laws, and position you to adapt easily to future IRS announcements.
Staying Ahead of the Curve
Prediction markets are rapidly transitioning from an emerging niche into a recognized, regulated segment of the financial landscape. North Carolina's recent legislation represents a major milestone, proving that state governments are actively building tax policies around this sector. Meanwhile, the lack of definitive IRS guidance means individual investors must make careful, well-informed reporting choices based on existing laws.
The rules of the game are changing. If you are actively trading these contracts, let's review your activity now to ensure you stay ahead of evolving federal and state tax developments. Reach out to our office today to schedule a consultation and build a proactive tax plan.
Want our best bookkeeping and business service tips and insights delivered to your inbox?
Sign up for our newsletter.
Get in touch