Understanding Michigan's Marijuana Tax Controversy

Michigan is at the forefront of a significant cannabis policy debate over a new 24% wholesale marijuana tax, which is already stirring constitutional concerns. With the initial court hearing underway, the case is capturing national attention due to its potential impact on cannabis pricing and its broader implications for voter-approved laws and tax policies across the United States.

Image 1

This case has the potential to affect more than just Michigan residents. Its outcome could influence the design, amendment, and defense of cannabis taxes in other states, offering a glimpse into future legal clashes as the industry expands.

What is Michigan Proposing?

As part of the 2025–2026 budget, Michigan lawmakers have sanctioned a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis intended to generate funds for road enhancements. This tax targets the supply chain before products reach dispensary shelves. Michigan’s current taxes include:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis sales, endorsed by voters in 2018

  • A 6% state sales tax on all retail transactions

Should the new wholesale tax be implemented, Michigan would hold one of the most comprehensive cannabis tax frameworks in the U.S.

Industry's Legal Challenge

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) contends that the tax is unconstitutional, emphasizing:

The 2018 voter-approved marijuana law mandates supermajority legislative approval for amendments.

The Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), endorsed by Michigan voters, became firmly protected, necessitating a three-fourths supermajority for any legislative changes. The wholesale tax was passed with just a simple majority.

According to MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol, “As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re here in court fighting to protect the will of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Image 2

Industry representatives caution that the tax will elevate costs, challenge small businesses, and potentially shift consumers back to illicit sources, a pattern observed in high-tax states like California.

The State's Defense

Michigan's state government argues the tax stands on legal ground because:

  • The wholesale tax represents a new initiative, separate from the 2018 cannabis law changes

  • The legislature possesses the right to establish taxes for fiscal needs

  • The tax aims to finance road infrastructure, not modify cannabis policy

If upheld by the courts, the tax may be enacted on January 1, 2026.

Impacts on Consumers

The decision's influence will be felt beyond Michigan, as cannabis tax frameworks often cross state borders. If the tax withstands legal challenges:

  • Wholesale prices will likely increase

  • Retail prices might rise as a response

  • Consumers could turn to more affordable unregulated markets

  • Small businesses might face financial strain or consolidation

If the tax is nullified, Michigan's current tax structure—already among the nation's more cost-effective—will remain.

National Significance of This Lawsuit

The case's implications extend well beyond Michigan's borders.

1. It challenges the bounds of voter-approved laws

Allowing legislators to impose taxes without a supermajority could redefine ballot initiative procedures in states that employ them.

2. It might alter other states' cannabis tax strategies

States facing infrastructure funding challenges might consider similar taxes if Michigan’s strategy prevails.

3. It underscores an ongoing issue: cannabis tax disparity

Some states, like Oregon and Michigan, have less burdensome taxes, making legal products competitive, while states like California battle high taxes feeding robust illicit markets.

Image 3

Michigan’s legal maneuvers could provide a blueprint for addressing tax disputes in other jurisdictions.

Next Steps in This Legal Journey

The Michigan Court of Claims has heard initial arguments and is expected to deliver a ruling soon, with the possibility of the case advancing to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Regardless of the decision, the ruling will be pivotal — not just for Michigan's cannabis enterprises, but also for the national conversation on handling voter-approved regulations, budding industries, and taxation authority.

Share this article...

Want our best bookkeeping and business service tips and insights delivered to your inbox?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

Let us take your tax and accounting needs off your hands today.

Get in touch

27451 Tourney Road, Ste. 160
Valencia, California 91355
FAQs Frequently Asked Questions
Contact
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully